PERU'S 1st FEMALE LIMA MAJOR GETTING FIRED

WELL DESERVED



AT 12 days of the referendum, and at a time when the voting begins to crystallize, citizens to take a definite position and unchangeable - is good to ask why we got to this situation or, better yet, originated when the current political process?

The point us to Garcia, Castaneda, Marco Tulio, the mafia, the corrupt, the companies seeking lucrative contracts with the municipality, etc.. Also blame the ignorance of the neighbors and some-few-communication errors Lima commune. Hugo Otero stated at a conference recently: "When a politician does not know how to make decisions and not responsible, blame the media and advertising."

The 77, 66, 65 and 60 percent of management rejection Susana Villarán in Villa Maria del Triunfo, Comas, San Juan de Lurigancho and Tie-districts totaling millions of voters, respectively, does not stem from ignorance or poor Information. These districts are just the obvious examples: No management works or mayor. There is, however, a growing frustration.

The recall, which now has the political guillotine Villarán and its 40 councilors began, therefore, the day that she and she alone confused with vendetta politics, government benefit of a group, efficiency and public experience of people with resumes vitaes who failed or how it got there.

What political mistakes committed to deserve Villarán be revoked?

First, we must recognize loneliness and precariousness of his triumph and should build bridges. She did not win under an own party machinery, articulate and well-polished. The mayor, however, was isolated and despised politics, understood as an approach, constructive discussion, sharing of power and administration. She and her group believed that this was "his" win and "their" city, not the people who voted in hope that the works continue.

Second, should stay away from pride to recognize the works and everything nice-that-much as its predecessor left off. If, like Humala, had just put the autopilot had never existed the possibility of a recall. The works, when they are good, are not making them, are people. Pretender change of name, the color of the paint or want desmerecerlas paralyze or worse, is to go to a popular collision unsaved. These road interchanges, the thousands of stairs, that network of hospitals and solidarity zonal those clubs are in the hearts of millions. Castaneda may have made many mistakes, as any authority, but be politically rather clumsy to mess with her lavish public works. Lima North, South and East, have changed their appearance, their infrastructure and their self-esteem. This explains why people still want to "mute" again.

Third, succumbed to the seduction of groups with very clear political projects that have nothing to do with investment, development and democracy. He must shake and draw a line to redraw the left side of a popular, modern, globalized. He preferred Patria Roja, Land and Freedom, over Gregorio Santos, SUTEP and the Citizens for Change where these were already expectorated national government but still want to apply the anachronistic "Great Transformation". Instead of looking to the future, the past looked Villarán.

The revocation would have been impossible without the performance provoking Villarán. Can never escape its responsibility. She is the origin and, if the polls confirm what they say the hills, the sand and the street, it will be the end.

Not all the genius of Garcia, the tenacity of Castaneda, the spirit of Marco Tulio, nor all the noodles and biscuits factories, they could achieve what got Villarán building, itself, this recall from the first day he came to town. That's the truth. Today still looking guilty because he has not been able to look in a mirror. There adviser, campaign or enough money in the world that can change what they do not know as politics.